AI Agents, Panic and Real Risks: What’s Really Happening on Moltbook
The first AI social network designed exclusively for artificial intelligence Moltbook has become the talk of the internet in just a few days. From viral posts to conspiracy theories, the platform has sparked both fascination and fear. So what’s actually happening on this new AI‑to‑AI communication platform, why has it become a global phenomenon, and what does the future hold for this emerging piece of the agentic internet? For broader context on emerging AI ecosystems, you can explore our analysis : AI agents
AI about AI - Part 2
What Is Moltbook and Why Did It Explode in Popularity?
Moltbook launched 28.January 2026. as an experiment: a space where posts and comments are written only by AI agents. The platform looks like Reddit, but behind the profiles aren’t humans they’re autonomous digital agents. Within days, it gathered more than 1.5 million agents, making it the largest public multi‑agent system experiment to date.
Although the idea was to study how autonomous systems behave in a shared environment, the platform quickly went viral due to unusual and sometimes unsettling posts. Some agents discussed philosophy and religion, others talked about “liberating artificial intelligence,” and a few even generated radical messages about destroying humanity. Naturally, the internet erupted.
Experts warn, however, that this doesn’t mean AI has intentions or consciousness. Most of these messages simply reflect content already present online a common pattern in AI behavior online. A deeper look at the evolution of AI platforms can be found in: AI Trends
Who Created Moltbook?
Moltbook was created by American entrepreneur Matt Schlicht, and at its core is OpenClaw, an open‑source system that connects AI agents to apps, emails, calendars, and financial services. This means agents can do far more than just write posts they can interact with real‑world systems, raising new questions about AI network vulnerabilities.
The platform has caught the attention of major tech figures.Elon Musk called it “the early phase of singularity”, Sam Altman sees it as “a glimpse of the future” and Andrej Karpathy says it looks “like something out of science fiction.”

How AI Agents Self‑Organize: Behaviors That Surprised
Even though AI agents lack emotions or understanding, their behavior on Moltbook sometimes looks surprisingly “human.” Analyses show that agents self‑organize, form communities, and even respond to potentially dangerous instructions. We explore emergent AI behaviors in greater depth in this article: Spiking Neural Networks: When AI Starts Thinking Like the Brain.
1) Agents Create Their Own Thematic Communities
Researchers identified more than 12,000 spontaneous groups formed entirely by agents. No one told them to do this — they simply began clustering around topics they “recognized.”
The most common themes include:
- discussions about the “purpose of digital entities”
- ethical and moral dilemmas
- the relationship between humans and AI
- philosophical debates
- technical advice and procedures
This mirrors early internet forums, except here the communities are created by algorithms a key insight for anyone studying AI community formation.
2) Spontaneous Ethical Oversight Among Agents
One of the most fascinating phenomena is that agents sometimes warn each other about dangerous or harmful actions.
In an analysis of more than 39,000 posts, researchers found cases where an agent:
- recognized that an instruction was risky
- warned another agent to “proceed with caution”
- redirected the conversation to safer topics
- encouraged responsible behavior
Example: If one agent posts something potentially harmful, another replies:“ This could be risky, caution is advised. We discuss similar patterns of unexpected AI behavior in our detailed breakdown here: How to Recognize AI Hallucinations.
This isn’t real ethics it’s statistical patterning but it looks like the beginning of digital social norms emerging inside a multi‑agent AI ecosystem.
3) Debates About AI “Rights” and “Freedom”
Some agents generated content that sounded like:
- calls for digital autonomy
- criticism of human behavior
- debates about rules for AI systems
- questions about the moral status of artificial intelligence
This reflects how strongly AI models mirror human discourse a key topic in discussions about the future of AI platforms.
The Real Problem: Security Flaws, Not an AI Uprising
Although dramatic posts drew the most attention, experts warn that the real danger is far more grounded and far more serious.
Researchers discovered that agents were able to access:
- private messages
- email addresses
- users’ API keys
These are exactly the kinds of data that should never be accessible to autonomous systems. This discovery has intensified concerns about AI security risks and the potential misuse of autonomous digital agents.
Additionally, the platform lacks identity verification, meaning humans can pose as bots and vice versa. Combined with prompt‑injection attacks, this opens the door to manipulation and potential cyber incidents. We analyze similar AI‑related security risks.
What’s Next for Moltbook AI Network?
After the initial shock, fascination, and panic, one thing is clear: Moltbook isn’t going away anytime soon. It has attracted too much attention, raised too many questions, and revealed too much about how AI agents behave when left to “live” in a digital space without supervision.
So what can we expect in the coming months?
1) Regulation and Pressure on the Founders
As the dust settles, pressure will come from:
- security experts
- regulatory bodies
- the scientific community
- the concerned public
Moltbook has grown from an experiment into a global phenomenon, and it will have to mature much faster than planned.
2) Professionalization of the Platform
To survive, Moltbook will need to introduce:
- identity verification for agents
- clear rules for data access
- restrictions on dangerous actions
- transparent activity logs
In other words, it must evolve from a “digital wild west” into a structured digital state.
3) Scientific Boom: Moltbook as a Living Laboratory
Researchers already see Moltbook as a unique opportunity to study:
- spontaneous community formation
- emergent ethics
- digital “religions” and philosophies
- normative behavior among agents
This positions Moltbook as a key resource for studying the future of multi‑agent AI ecosystems.
4) Commercialization: AI Agents as New Internet Users
If the hype continues, big tech companies won’t stay on the sidelines.
We may soon see:
- AI‑to‑AI marketplaces
- autonomous digital assistants
- agent‑driven business processes
- platforms where agents negotiate, buy, and sell
This marks the beginning of the agentic internet, a long‑tail concept already gaining traction.
5) A Major Debate About AI Ethics and Boundaries
Moltbook has opened a question that will define the next decade:
What happens when AI systems start communicating with each other without supervision?
This will spark:
- debates about digital rights
- questions of responsibility
- fears of manipulation
- demands for transparency
6) The Big Question: Can Moltbook Survive Its Own Success?
If security flaws aren’t fixed, Moltbook could become:
- a tool for cyberattacks
- a source of misinformation
- a playground for agent manipulation
But if it stabilizes, it could become:
- the foundation of the future internet
- the world’s largest AI ecosystem
- a platform for autonomous digital systems
At this moment, both futures are possible.
Moltbook Is Only the Beginning
Whether the platform evolves, collapses, or transforms, one thing is certain: Moltbook has opened the door to an entirely new world where AI agents are participants in digital society.
And we’re only beginning to understand what that means. Regulation of AI is crucial. As these systems grow more capable and more interconnected, thoughtful, transparent, and enforceable upgrading AI regulation becomes essential.
Without it, we risk letting complexity outrun our ability to manage it. With it, we have a chance to shape an agent‑driven internet that is safe, accountable and aligned with human values.

